Every so often I have come across things in textbooks that make no sense to me, and that is no different for the classifications of drama. Drama can be broadly split into two categories, comedy and tragedy, which I agree with, most movies- since that is as close to plays as teenagers see- fall into those categories. It’s what those topics entail that I do not understand. Comedies are supposed to highlight human failure to get the audience laughing while the tragedy is supposed to highlight human greatness. I’m not sure what society is presenting now, but it doesn’t fall within that definition anymore, it seems backwards now. Today’s comedies always end happy, I cannot think of a movie that made me laugh but left me disappointed with the main character and aware of its flaws or flaws in the human race. I can’t think of a sad movie that I walked out of either that left me admiring the main character in anyway- I usually just want to forget about the story and move on.
The arts we are presented with now seem much more black and white divided between these categories. Comedies are funny, have happy endings and tie up all storylines. Tragedies are usually not funny. More emotional and dramatic, and have a tendency to leave the viewer drained. Think about the past few movies or- if you have had the opportunity- plays. They wall within these new divisions don’t they? Perhaps older plays follow this pattern closely, but for now, to me it seems that today this definition seems outdated. Honestly, I am glad the ideas presented in these two types have changed. I really don’t want to watch a comedy that makes me think about humanity or a tragedy that makes me cry, and perhaps that this is why the two have evolved. Most people want mindless entertainment that they can walk out of happy-and I think I can live with that.
Emily S.


_Irish_Frankenstein.jpg)